Philosophical, Psychological & Social Foundations of Curriculum Development
In the study of curriculum foundations, we begin with the Philosophical Foundations, which act as the primary blueprint for the entire educational system. This pillar asks the fundamental questions regarding the purpose of education and the nature of imparting knowledge.
Whether a curriculum follows Perennialism (focusing on everlasting truths), Essentialism (focusing on core skills), Progressivism (focusing on student interests), or Reconstructionism (focusing on social change), the chosen philosophy dictates which subjects are prioritised and what kind of citizens the school/college/university aims to produce.
It provides the moral and intellectual framework that justifies "why" we teach and "what" we teach.
Moving to the Psychological Foundations, the focus shifts from the "why" to the "how." This foundation draws on theories of human development and learning to ensure that the curriculum is age-appropriate and mentally engaging.
It examines Cognitive Psychology, which looks at how the brain processes and stores information, and Humanistic Psychology, which considers the learner's emotional well-being and self-actualisation.
By understanding the stages of child development, curriculum designers can sequence topics to align with a student’s readiness to learn, ensuring that the material is neither too simple to be boring nor too complex to be discouraging.
The Sociological Foundations acknowledge that educational institutions do not exist in isolation but are reflections of the society that surrounds them. This foundation addresses the relationship between the curriculum and the community, culture, and economy.
It involves Cultural Transmission, where the educational institutions pass down the language and values of a society, as well as Social Integration, which helps students from diverse backgrounds find common ground.
In a modern-day educational context, this foundation also emphasises the need for a "Globalised Curriculum" that prepares students for a diverse, interconnected world while addressing the pressing social issues, such as equity and technology.
Behaviourist vs. Constructivist Designs in Primary Grades
When comparing curriculum designs for the primary grades, Behaviourism is characterised by a highly structured, teacher-centred environment. The primary level education system of Japan is centred around "Behaviourism."
Based on the work of theorists like B.F. Skinner, this design relies on the "Stimulus-Response" model, where learning is reinforced through rewards and repetition.
In a primary classroom, this often looks like direct instruction, rote memorisation of Maths-facts, and clear-cut grading systems.
The goal is mastery of specific, observable skills through a linear progression where students move to the next level only after proving they have "learned" the current behaviour.
In contrast, Constructivism views the primary student as an active "meaning-maker" rather than a passive recipient of information. Drawing from Piaget and Vygotsky, this design encourages students to build their own understanding by interacting with their environment and peers. Finland's primary education system is centred around "Constructivism."
The curriculum is often organised around "Big Ideas" or inquiry-based projects rather than isolated facts. In the primary grades, a constructivist approach favours hands-on manipulatives in Maths, "whole language" reading experiences, and collaborative play.
The teacher acts as a facilitator who asks "scaffolding" questions to help the child reach their own conclusions, prioritising the process of thinking over the final correct answer.
Behaviourist vs. Constructivist Curriculum Designs
In primary grades, the debate often centres on these two psychological perspectives. Below is a comparison of how they look in a B.Ed. context.
|
Feature |
Behaviourist Design (e.g.,
Skinner) |
Constructivist Design (e.g.,
Piaget, Vygotsky) |
|
View of Learning |
Learning
is a change in observable behaviour through S-R
(Stimulus-Response). |
Learning
is an active process where students construct meaning from
experience. |
|
Teacher
Role |
Director/Expert: Transmits knowledge and
provides rewards (stickers, praise). |
Facilitator/Guide: Sets up environments where
students explore and ask questions. |
|
Curriculum
Structure |
Linear
& Sequential: Broken
into small, manageable "bits" or modules. |
Holistic/Spiral: Focuses on big concepts;
revisits topics with increasing depth. |
|
Primary
Activities |
Rote
memorisation, drill-and-practice, flashcards, timed tests. |
Problem-solving,
group work, "Hands-on" projects, and discovery learning. |
|
Assessment |
Objective: Multiple-choice tests,
correct/incorrect answers, mastery of skills. |
Authentic: Portfolios, reflections,
self-assessment, and process-based grading. |
In conclusion, the foundations of curriculum serve as the invisible scaffolding upon which all educational experiences are built. By integrating philosophy, psychology, and sociology, curriculum designers ensure that schooling is not just a random collection of facts, but a purposeful journey that aligns with human values, natural learning cycles, and the needs of a changing society.
For a B.Ed. level professional, understanding these foundations is the difference between simply "following a textbook" and being a reflective practitioner who can adapt to the diverse needs of a classroom.
Key Takeaways
The Foundations are Interdependent: Philosophy sets the goals, Psychology provides the methods, and Sociology ensures the context. A curriculum that ignores any one of these three will likely fail to meet the students' needs.
Design Choice Impacts Agency: Selecting between Behaviourism and Constructivism dictates how much agency a student has. While Behaviourism is effective for establishing foundational discipline and factual fluency, Constructivism is vital for developing independent thinkers and lifelong learners.
Context is King in Primary Grades: In early childhood education, the curriculum must be developmentally appropriate. This often means moving away from rigid, rote-based behaviourist models toward more "scaffolded" constructivist experiences that respect the child’s natural curiosity.
Balance is the Goal: Modern education rarely uses one theory in isolation. The most effective primary grade curricula utilise behaviourist techniques for "low-level" mastery (like phonics or basic sums) and constructivist techniques for "high-level" application (like creative writing or scientific inquiry).
Comments